<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ben Eadie on Revision3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rickyjordan.com/2008/10/ben-eadie-on-revision3.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rickyjordan.com/2008/10/ben-eadie-on-revision3.html</link>
	<description>SolidWorks, The CAD Industry, &#38; More!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 05:49:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://www.rickyjordan.com/2008/10/ben-eadie-on-revision3.html/comment-page-1#comment-2097</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 13:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rickyjordan.com/?p=881#comment-2097</guid>
		<description>So thats what he looks like...I dont think I&#039;ll tell him he has sheetmetal underpants - looks like he goes to the gym...still as long as he is less than 6&#039;3&quot; I might be ok&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I tried some experiments DAVID myself a while ago (like probably more a year ago I think)&lt;br&gt;I remember I emailed one of the bloggers that the handiman laser I used (since I found out on his blog that his company designed it) was a useless tool - which it was, sorry man- .the laser itself was good enough for my purposes though.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;IMO DAVID was ok but not great. It would definitely help to get the best results to spend a little more on a fine line laser and a better webcam than I used..&lt;br&gt;I would consider this solution for some things but still go for a proper scanning service for important missions.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;BTW DAVID 2.1 has just come out in the last few days</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So thats what he looks like&#8230;I dont think I&#39;ll tell him he has sheetmetal underpants &#8211; looks like he goes to the gym&#8230;still as long as he is less than 6&#39;3&#8243; I might be ok</p>
<p>I tried some experiments DAVID myself a while ago (like probably more a year ago I think)<br />I remember I emailed one of the bloggers that the handiman laser I used (since I found out on his blog that his company designed it) was a useless tool &#8211; which it was, sorry man- .the laser itself was good enough for my purposes though.</p>
<p>IMO DAVID was ok but not great. It would definitely help to get the best results to spend a little more on a fine line laser and a better webcam than I used..<br />I would consider this solution for some things but still go for a proper scanning service for important missions.</p>
<p>BTW DAVID 2.1 has just come out in the last few days</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://www.rickyjordan.com/2008/10/ben-eadie-on-revision3.html/comment-page-1#comment-993</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 07:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rickyjordan.com/?p=881#comment-993</guid>
		<description>So thats what he looks like...I dont think I&#039;ll tell him he has sheetmetal underpants - looks like he goes to the gym...still as long as he is less than 6&#039;3&quot; I might be ok&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I tried some experiments DAVID myself a while ago (like probably more a year ago I think)&lt;br&gt;I remember I emailed one of the bloggers that the handiman laser I used (since I found out on his blog that his company designed it) was a useless tool - which it was, sorry man- .the laser itself was good enough for my purposes though.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;IMO DAVID was ok but not great. It would definitely help to get the best results to spend a little more on a fine line laser and a better webcam than I used..&lt;br&gt;I would consider this solution for some things but still go for a proper scanning service for important missions.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;BTW DAVID 2.1 has just come out in the last few days</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So thats what he looks like&#8230;I dont think I&#39;ll tell him he has sheetmetal underpants &#8211; looks like he goes to the gym&#8230;still as long as he is less than 6&#39;3&#8243; I might be ok</p>
<p>I tried some experiments DAVID myself a while ago (like probably more a year ago I think)<br />I remember I emailed one of the bloggers that the handiman laser I used (since I found out on his blog that his company designed it) was a useless tool &#8211; which it was, sorry man- .the laser itself was good enough for my purposes though.</p>
<p>IMO DAVID was ok but not great. It would definitely help to get the best results to spend a little more on a fine line laser and a better webcam than I used..<br />I would consider this solution for some things but still go for a proper scanning service for important missions.</p>
<p>BTW DAVID 2.1 has just come out in the last few days</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

