<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SolidWorks 2009:  Instant3D</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rickyjordan.com/2008/08/solidworks-2009-instant3d.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rickyjordan.com/2008/08/solidworks-2009-instant3d.html</link>
	<description>SolidWorks, The CAD Industry, &#38; More!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 12:39:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: tim</title>
		<link>http://www.rickyjordan.com/2008/08/solidworks-2009-instant3d.html/comment-page-1#comment-370</link>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 05:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rickyjordan.com/?p=497#comment-370</guid>
		<description>Ricky,
Thanks for great blog posts+great comment replies.
can you explain what &quot;internal accuracy issues&quot; are? + i have always wanted to know why there are flaws to imported/exported geometries although they are according to a Standard format (iges,step,...) and seemingly both cad systems support that standard?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ricky,<br />
Thanks for great blog posts+great comment replies.<br />
can you explain what &#8220;internal accuracy issues&#8221; are? + i have always wanted to know why there are flaws to imported/exported geometries although they are according to a Standard format (iges,step,&#8230;) and seemingly both cad systems support that standard?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim</title>
		<link>http://www.rickyjordan.com/2008/08/solidworks-2009-instant3d.html/comment-page-1#comment-662</link>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 04:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rickyjordan.com/?p=497#comment-662</guid>
		<description>Ricky,&lt;br&gt;Thanks for great blog posts+great comment replies.&lt;br&gt;can you explain what &quot;internal accuracy issues&quot; are? + i have always wanted to know why there are flaws to imported/exported geometries although they are according to a Standard format (iges,step,...) and seemingly both cad systems support that standard?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ricky,<br />Thanks for great blog posts+great comment replies.<br />can you explain what &#8220;internal accuracy issues&#8221; are? + i have always wanted to know why there are flaws to imported/exported geometries although they are according to a Standard format (iges,step,&#8230;) and seemingly both cad systems support that standard?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricky Jordan</title>
		<link>http://www.rickyjordan.com/2008/08/solidworks-2009-instant3d.html/comment-page-1#comment-369</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricky Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 03:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rickyjordan.com/?p=497#comment-369</guid>
		<description>Van,

It&#039;s not a major hassle but I certainly would like to see some tools added in the future that would allow a little more freedom when it comes to modifying imported geometry.  

A lot of it really depends on the geometry you are trying to modify and what specifically you are trying to accomplish.  If you are making some basic tweaks such as adding/removing holes, adding draft, fillet reworking, &amp; moving faces then SolidWorks is a very effective tool for the job.

There comes a point when the modifications become so numerous that you are often times better off remodeling the part from scratch.   

The biggest improvement I would like to see in SolidWorks is some re-parametrization tools that allows for more direct editing when you get an imported file that has internal accuracy issues.  This is where you see move face and delete face commands sometimes fail.  I think the Move Face and some of the other direct editing tools could use some improvement in from a UI standpoint as well.  

Ricky</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Van,</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not a major hassle but I certainly would like to see some tools added in the future that would allow a little more freedom when it comes to modifying imported geometry.  </p>
<p>A lot of it really depends on the geometry you are trying to modify and what specifically you are trying to accomplish.  If you are making some basic tweaks such as adding/removing holes, adding draft, fillet reworking, &#038; moving faces then SolidWorks is a very effective tool for the job.</p>
<p>There comes a point when the modifications become so numerous that you are often times better off remodeling the part from scratch.   </p>
<p>The biggest improvement I would like to see in SolidWorks is some re-parametrization tools that allows for more direct editing when you get an imported file that has internal accuracy issues.  This is where you see move face and delete face commands sometimes fail.  I think the Move Face and some of the other direct editing tools could use some improvement in from a UI standpoint as well.  </p>
<p>Ricky</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Van Knopp</title>
		<link>http://www.rickyjordan.com/2008/08/solidworks-2009-instant3d.html/comment-page-1#comment-368</link>
		<dc:creator>Van Knopp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 02:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rickyjordan.com/?p=497#comment-368</guid>
		<description>Ricky, it sounds like it&#039;s really a major hassle to work with imported geometry in Solidworks.  For those who work mainly with imported geometry is SolidWorks the wrong tool to use?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ricky, it sounds like it&#8217;s really a major hassle to work with imported geometry in Solidworks.  For those who work mainly with imported geometry is SolidWorks the wrong tool to use?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricky Jordan</title>
		<link>http://www.rickyjordan.com/2008/08/solidworks-2009-instant3d.html/comment-page-1#comment-661</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricky Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 02:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rickyjordan.com/?p=497#comment-661</guid>
		<description>Van,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s not a major hassle but I certainly would like to see some tools added in the future that would allow a little more freedom when it comes to modifying imported geometry.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A lot of it really depends on the geometry you are trying to modify and what specifically you are trying to accomplish.  If you are making some basic tweaks such as adding/removing holes, adding draft, fillet reworking, &amp; moving faces then SolidWorks is a very effective tool for the job.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There comes a point when the modifications become so numerous that you are often times better off remodeling the part from scratch.   &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The biggest improvement I would like to see in SolidWorks is some re-parametrization tools that allows for more direct editing when you get an imported file that has internal accuracy issues.  This is where you see move face and delete face commands sometimes fail.  I think the Move Face and some of the other direct editing tools could use some improvement in from a UI standpoint as well.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ricky</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Van,</p>
<p>It&#39;s not a major hassle but I certainly would like to see some tools added in the future that would allow a little more freedom when it comes to modifying imported geometry.  </p>
<p>A lot of it really depends on the geometry you are trying to modify and what specifically you are trying to accomplish.  If you are making some basic tweaks such as adding/removing holes, adding draft, fillet reworking, &#038; moving faces then SolidWorks is a very effective tool for the job.</p>
<p>There comes a point when the modifications become so numerous that you are often times better off remodeling the part from scratch.   </p>
<p>The biggest improvement I would like to see in SolidWorks is some re-parametrization tools that allows for more direct editing when you get an imported file that has internal accuracy issues.  This is where you see move face and delete face commands sometimes fail.  I think the Move Face and some of the other direct editing tools could use some improvement in from a UI standpoint as well.  </p>
<p>Ricky</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Van Knopp</title>
		<link>http://www.rickyjordan.com/2008/08/solidworks-2009-instant3d.html/comment-page-1#comment-660</link>
		<dc:creator>Van Knopp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 01:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rickyjordan.com/?p=497#comment-660</guid>
		<description>Ricky, it sounds like it&#039;s really a major hassle to work with imported geometry in Solidworks.  For those who work mainly with imported geometry is SolidWorks the wrong tool to use?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ricky, it sounds like it&#39;s really a major hassle to work with imported geometry in Solidworks.  For those who work mainly with imported geometry is SolidWorks the wrong tool to use?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricky Jordan</title>
		<link>http://www.rickyjordan.com/2008/08/solidworks-2009-instant3d.html/comment-page-1#comment-367</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricky Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 00:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rickyjordan.com/?p=497#comment-367</guid>
		<description>Modification of imported geometry is best performed with a combination of tools in SolidWorks.  When I work with imported data I often use a combination of Delete Face, Move Face, Surface Fill, Boundary Surface, and a number of other surface generation tools.  

Instant3D is currently intended to be used primarily on SolidWorks models with parametric features. (The exception is Fillet recognition with FeatureWorks active.)  Many in the SolidWorks Community believe that direct editing features added in future releases will fall under the Instant3D banner.    

Ricky</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Modification of imported geometry is best performed with a combination of tools in SolidWorks.  When I work with imported data I often use a combination of Delete Face, Move Face, Surface Fill, Boundary Surface, and a number of other surface generation tools.  </p>
<p>Instant3D is currently intended to be used primarily on SolidWorks models with parametric features. (The exception is Fillet recognition with FeatureWorks active.)  Many in the SolidWorks Community believe that direct editing features added in future releases will fall under the Instant3D banner.    </p>
<p>Ricky</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricky Jordan</title>
		<link>http://www.rickyjordan.com/2008/08/solidworks-2009-instant3d.html/comment-page-1#comment-659</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricky Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 23:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rickyjordan.com/?p=497#comment-659</guid>
		<description>Modification of imported geometry is best performed with a combination of tools in SolidWorks.  When I work with imported data I often use a combination of Delete Face, Move Face, Surface Fill, Boundary Surface, and a number of other surface generation tools.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Instant3D is currently intended to be used primarily on SolidWorks models with parametric features. (The exception is Fillet recognition with FeatureWorks active.)  Many in the SolidWorks Community believe that direct editing features added in future releases will fall under the Instant3D banner.    &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ricky</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Modification of imported geometry is best performed with a combination of tools in SolidWorks.  When I work with imported data I often use a combination of Delete Face, Move Face, Surface Fill, Boundary Surface, and a number of other surface generation tools.  </p>
<p>Instant3D is currently intended to be used primarily on SolidWorks models with parametric features. (The exception is Fillet recognition with FeatureWorks active.)  Many in the SolidWorks Community believe that direct editing features added in future releases will fall under the Instant3D banner.    </p>
<p>Ricky</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: *</title>
		<link>http://www.rickyjordan.com/2008/08/solidworks-2009-instant3d.html/comment-page-1#comment-363</link>
		<dc:creator>*</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 19:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rickyjordan.com/?p=497#comment-363</guid>
		<description>How does Instant 3D work on imported geometry?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does Instant 3D work on imported geometry?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: *</title>
		<link>http://www.rickyjordan.com/2008/08/solidworks-2009-instant3d.html/comment-page-1#comment-658</link>
		<dc:creator>*</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 18:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rickyjordan.com/?p=497#comment-658</guid>
		<description>How does Instant 3D work on imported geometry?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does Instant 3D work on imported geometry?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
