<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What types of SolidWorks 2007 features are YOU interested in?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rickyjordan.com/2006/07/what_types_of_s.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rickyjordan.com/2006/07/what_types_of_s.html</link>
	<description>SolidWorks, The CAD Industry, &#38; More!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 05:49:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricky Jordan</title>
		<link>http://www.rickyjordan.com/2006/07/what_types_of_s.html/comment-page-1#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricky Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 15:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://74.220.219.56/~rickyjor/2006/07/what-types-of-solidworks-2007-features-are-you-interested-in.html#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Hi TJ,

I&#039;ll see what I can whip up on the belts &amp; chains enhancements.  I&#039;ve played with it a little bit and have been REALLY impressed so far. (Both sketch &amp; assembly) As a former machine designer, I really can appreciate a feature like this.

As far as the assembly mirror issues go, I am right there with you.  It still has a ways to go before it is where I feel it should be.  All I can say is keep putting in your enhancement requests.  If you know other people who really need this as well, have them put an enhancement request in as well.

Thanks for the feedback!

Best Regards,

Ricky Jordan
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi TJ,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll see what I can whip up on the belts &#038; chains enhancements.  I&#8217;ve played with it a little bit and have been REALLY impressed so far. (Both sketch &#038; assembly) As a former machine designer, I really can appreciate a feature like this.</p>
<p>As far as the assembly mirror issues go, I am right there with you.  It still has a ways to go before it is where I feel it should be.  All I can say is keep putting in your enhancement requests.  If you know other people who really need this as well, have them put an enhancement request in as well.</p>
<p>Thanks for the feedback!</p>
<p>Best Regards,</p>
<p>Ricky Jordan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricky Jordan</title>
		<link>http://www.rickyjordan.com/2006/07/what_types_of_s.html/comment-page-1#comment-614</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricky Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 14:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://74.220.219.56/~rickyjor/2006/07/what-types-of-solidworks-2007-features-are-you-interested-in.html#comment-614</guid>
		<description>Hi TJ,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;ll see what I can whip up on the belts &amp; chains enhancements.  I&#039;ve played with it a little bit and have been REALLY impressed so far. (Both sketch &amp; assembly) As a former machine designer, I really can appreciate a feature like this.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As far as the assembly mirror issues go, I am right there with you.  It still has a ways to go before it is where I feel it should be.  All I can say is keep putting in your enhancement requests.  If you know other people who really need this as well, have them put an enhancement request in as well.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for the feedback!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Best Regards,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ricky Jordan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi TJ,</p>
<p>I&#39;ll see what I can whip up on the belts &#038; chains enhancements.  I&#39;ve played with it a little bit and have been REALLY impressed so far. (Both sketch &#038; assembly) As a former machine designer, I really can appreciate a feature like this.</p>
<p>As far as the assembly mirror issues go, I am right there with you.  It still has a ways to go before it is where I feel it should be.  All I can say is keep putting in your enhancement requests.  If you know other people who really need this as well, have them put an enhancement request in as well.</p>
<p>Thanks for the feedback!</p>
<p>Best Regards,</p>
<p>Ricky Jordan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TJ McDermott</title>
		<link>http://www.rickyjordan.com/2006/07/what_types_of_s.html/comment-page-1#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>TJ McDermott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jul 2006 04:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://74.220.219.56/~rickyjor/2006/07/what-types-of-solidworks-2007-features-are-you-interested-in.html#comment-6</guid>
		<description>The belts &amp; chains feature sounds marvelous, if it is not processor intensive.

I&#039;m also excited to see that they&#039;ve added a real mirror feature to assemblies, one that remembers its parametric information the way component pattern does.  Oh, wait.  SolidWorks didn&#039;t really add a good mirror feature after all.  instead of something useful like that, they&#039;re still touting the universally unused Design Checker.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The belts &#038; chains feature sounds marvelous, if it is not processor intensive.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also excited to see that they&#8217;ve added a real mirror feature to assemblies, one that remembers its parametric information the way component pattern does.  Oh, wait.  SolidWorks didn&#8217;t really add a good mirror feature after all.  instead of something useful like that, they&#8217;re still touting the universally unused Design Checker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TJ McDermott</title>
		<link>http://www.rickyjordan.com/2006/07/what_types_of_s.html/comment-page-1#comment-613</link>
		<dc:creator>TJ McDermott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jul 2006 03:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://74.220.219.56/~rickyjor/2006/07/what-types-of-solidworks-2007-features-are-you-interested-in.html#comment-613</guid>
		<description>The belts &amp; chains feature sounds marvelous, if it is not processor intensive.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m also excited to see that they&#039;ve added a real mirror feature to assemblies, one that remembers its parametric information the way component pattern does.  Oh, wait.  SolidWorks didn&#039;t really add a good mirror feature after all.  instead of something useful like that, they&#039;re still touting the universally unused Design Checker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The belts &#038; chains feature sounds marvelous, if it is not processor intensive.</p>
<p>I&#39;m also excited to see that they&#39;ve added a real mirror feature to assemblies, one that remembers its parametric information the way component pattern does.  Oh, wait.  SolidWorks didn&#39;t really add a good mirror feature after all.  instead of something useful like that, they&#39;re still touting the universally unused Design Checker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

