<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SolidWorks 2007:  Splines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rickyjordan.com/2006/07/solidworks_2007.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rickyjordan.com/2006/07/solidworks_2007.html</link>
	<description>SolidWorks, The CAD Industry, &#38; More!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 05:49:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: air jordan 12</title>
		<link>http://www.rickyjordan.com/2006/07/solidworks_2007.html/comment-page-1#comment-2519</link>
		<dc:creator>air jordan 12</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 09:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://74.220.219.56/~rickyjor/2006/07/solidworks-2007-splines.html#comment-2519</guid>
		<description>Well , the view of the passage is  totally correct ,your details is really reasonable and you guy give us valuable informative post, I totally agree the standpoint of upstairs. I often surfing on this forum when I m free and I find there are so much good information we can learn in this forum! &lt;a href=&quot;http://less-accurate.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://less-accurate.com/&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well , the view of the passage is  totally correct ,your details is really reasonable and you guy give us valuable informative post, I totally agree the standpoint of upstairs. I often surfing on this forum when I m free and I find there are so much good information we can learn in this forum! <a href="http://less-accurate.com/" rel="nofollow">http://less-accurate.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: automated equipment design</title>
		<link>http://www.rickyjordan.com/2006/07/solidworks_2007.html/comment-page-1#comment-1704</link>
		<dc:creator>automated equipment design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 01:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://74.220.219.56/~rickyjor/2006/07/solidworks-2007-splines.html#comment-1704</guid>
		<description>WEll I found solidworks 2006 more useful than solidworks 2007. The enhancements are pretty good no doubt about it, but since you recommend using 2007 I&#039;ll give it a try again</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WEll I found solidworks 2006 more useful than solidworks 2007. The enhancements are pretty good no doubt about it, but since you recommend using 2007 I&#39;ll give it a try again</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neil</title>
		<link>http://www.rickyjordan.com/2006/07/solidworks_2007.html/comment-page-1#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 06:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://74.220.219.56/~rickyjor/2006/07/solidworks-2007-splines.html#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Thanks for another good report Ricky.
Those enhancements look pretty good to me coming from 05.
Will watch with interest to see how the bugs go.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for another good report Ricky.<br />
Those enhancements look pretty good to me coming from 05.<br />
Will watch with interest to see how the bugs go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neil</title>
		<link>http://www.rickyjordan.com/2006/07/solidworks_2007.html/comment-page-1#comment-853</link>
		<dc:creator>neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 05:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://74.220.219.56/~rickyjor/2006/07/solidworks-2007-splines.html#comment-853</guid>
		<description>Thanks for another good report Ricky.&lt;br&gt;Those enhancements look pretty good to me coming from 05.&lt;br&gt;Will watch with interest to see how the bugs go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for another good report Ricky.<br />Those enhancements look pretty good to me coming from 05.<br />Will watch with interest to see how the bugs go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

